Bloody Agreement Bush-Blair decided the fate of Iraq a year before the attacks

               



The invasion of Iraq in 2003 has returned to the international focus, as new data show that his fate has been predetermined.

As a sensitive issue, which holds the initiative and the signature of former US President George Bush, recently there are some facts that shed light on what Bush wanted necessarily to realize: Invasion of Iraq's insistence that there were localized gun a high danger.

His occupation agreement was signed by Tony Blair and George Bush, a year before the attacks. An official document of the White House discolored and published by "Daily Mail", reveals what is considered as "the bloody agreement" signed by former British Prime Minister and the former US president.

This document is made public approval of Tony Blair for the military offensive in Iraq, while on the other hand trumpeted for political and diplomatic solutions. His voters Blair said: "We do not propose military intervention." But in contrast, the approval email is clear that Blair was Bush's default plan, which paved the way for the US to continue with its strategy in Iraq after Britain recognized as one of their main allies.

In this email, which was written by former US Secretary of State Colin Powell addressed his president, Bush, it was announced head of the White House that in the coming days they will be waiting in Crawford, former Prime Minister Britain's Tony Blair. In parenthesis, Powell explained George Bush which would be the main points of their discussion.

"Blair continues to be on the side of the United States, as in continuing our fight against terrorism in Iraq. He will present you you his strategy, tactics and lines itself considers that Tony Blair will strengthen global commitment to our common cause, "read the email.

In the email did not mention any diplomatic solution to Iraq, in contrast to the promises of Tony Blair, which shows behind the scenes between the two leaders.

"On the question of Iraq, he is on our side, and will intervene militarily if necessary. He is focused on two points: The first threat is real, and secondly, the battle against Saddam Hussein will reap more success ".

These documents are dated April 2002, while the military offensive in Iraq began a year later, precisely in March 2003. The scandal in the US, follows the previous one, which is centered precisely presidential candidate Hillary Clinton . But this was the reason why the next discovery, after the US court's decision to reveal the emails of former Secretary of State, Clinton, gave way to the relevant authorities verifying thousands of documents.

President George Bush in those years necessarily require allied invasion of Iraq, urging other countries to join, seeking the approval of the Security Council of the UN, the scenario he faced harsh opposition from China and Russia. But as the British media write this conspiracy created recently and discolored by the "Daily Mail" will pave the way for the investigation of war in Iraq.
Share on Google Plus

Powered by Blogger.